12/23/2011
BS Aquino III had wanted to
impeach the Supreme Court (SC) Chief Justice (CJ) as far back as
January, our informant tells us. Now, even the Senate President faces an
ouster plot by a Liberal Party that wants to consolidate its hold on
the upper chamber, with the last phase of the plan getting the Vice-
President “boiled” in the proverbial “hot water.”
Eight
demonstrably lame charges were raised against the CJ, such as his
alleged “biased” decisions — despite the fact that SC decisions are
collectively arrived at. What is indisputable is that this CJ ouster
move would allow BS Aquino and his cohorts to appoint one of their own
to the top post, such as (alleged Machiavellian) Justice Antonio Carpio
of “The Firm” or Ma. Lourdes Sereno, a demonstrably biased magistrate
for the ruling powers.
Our source, very high up in politics, was
told in a visit to Malacañang last January — long before the Palace and
its previous occupant figured in a “hold departure” imbroglio — that the
maximum goal was to oust nine more SC justices. Why would Malacañang
want this if the problem, as it is being made to appear, is simply the
CJ (along with perhaps two of his associates)?
It should be clear
by now that there is a bigger agenda to this impeachment: The
replacement of as many sitting justices with BS Aquino’s appointees.
Hence, the goal is full control of the SC, with justices beholden and
compliant to the Executive. After this, there will be full control of
the Senate; and an autocracy without a vice- president would soon
follow.
Who could have thought of this? Like many of us, my
informant does not think that either BS Aquino or his lieutenant is
bright enough to conceive of such a plan. We are, of course, no stranger
to PeNoy’s fecklessness throughout his stints in the House and the
Senate; in his election campaign; and, now, his know-nothing, do-nothing
presidency.
It is apparent that Renato Corona was speaking with
more than just propaganda (or even Hacienda Luisita) in mind when he
accused BSA III of fomenting a “dictatorship” — though I think by the
time the VP is immobilized, the term “autocracy” would be more accurate.
So, who could be so skillfully coaxing PeNoy into this direction and
why?
Knowing the history of authoritarianism (of both President
Marcos and Cory Aquino), we can only conclude that it is no one else but
the US State Department.
Marcos kept Ambassador Henry Byroade on
martial law plans, even as he had the brains to plan and carry it out
all by himself. Cory, meanwhile, had her “revolution” and
“revolutionary government” thanks to the US. BSA III’s candidacy was
also conceived and run for him by the same forces that backed his
mother. Kristie Kenney, the US envoy at that time, even appeared on
national TV saying, “I wear Yellow,” in the run-up to the polls.
Later
on, as PeNoy was in his first few months in office, one of his
executives kept asking one of the Yellow veterans this question: “Has
the US Embassy talked to you?”
When the executive no longer
sought him for guidance, this Yellow veteran (who remains anonymous for
now upon his request) then asked him about this and was told that the
Palace was already in close touch with the Embassy.
Yes, the US
State Department does micro-manage, especially when it’s a matter of
national security — like when it micro-managed the transition from
Marcos to Cory with the frenzied trips of Philip Habib and Stephen
Solarz, or the earlier “snap election” TV interview with Nightline host,
etc.
Marcos planned martial law from 1966 to the moment it was
declared in 1972. While BSA III didn’t plan his mother’s death or his
run for the highest seat, he did “win” after a confounded automated
election system, which coincidentally used US-based Dominion Voting
Systems software that faced many issues in New York’s elections.
With
the gamut of social and economic challenges left unaddressed, BSA III
curiously gives priority to his government’s conflict with the SC, as
well as a foiled Senate shake-up. Amid this faltering governance, US
State Department officials, namely, Hillary Clinton, seem to be more
concerned with buttressing PeNoy’s “machismo” exertions on the South
China Sea and “upgrading” Philippine naval assets with “junk” Hamilton
cutters.
Last Nov. 17, Barack Obama declared before the Australian
Parliament that the US will now “shift from the war on terrorism to
economic and security challenges in the Asia-Pacific region,” as he
deployed 2,500 US Marines to that country. Indonesia warned that such a
ove will only spark tension and mistrust, on top of “irritating” China.
It was then no accident that President Hu Jin Tao called on the Chinese
Navy weeks later to “prepare for combat.”
All this is happening under a simmering new “cold war,” with Russia on the European front and us in the Pacific theater.
On
Dec. 12, the little gun-loving PeNoy addressed the new Armed Forces
chief “to shift the military’s focus from defending the country from
internal threats to defending it from external (ones), particularly
intruders… since the government’s separate peace negotiations with
communist rebels and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) are moving
forward.”
I have always wondered why communist leader JoMa Sison
went to the Netherlands, and not Cuba or China, for exile; or why Ninoy
coddled and Cory released him. Now, he is rumored to be coming home to
sanctify another Aquino in order to cap off the political consolidation.
With
the many rebellions supposedly ending, with the MILF soon happy with
its territories (having permanent US bases), and with BSA III as their
unifying leader, what could be the end game? Is it to unite the nation
in a “holy war” against the intruder in the now dubbed West Philippine
Sea; is it to nettle and consternate the enemy of the US while inviting
devastation the way the Philippines did in World War II? Useful idiots
all indeed!
(Tune in to Sulo ng Pilipino/Radyo OpinYon, Monday to
Friday, 5 to 6 p.m. on 1098AM; Talk News TV with HTL, Saturday, 8:15 to 9
p.m., with replay at 11 p.m., on GNN, Destiny Cable Channel 8; visit
http://newkatipunero.blogspot.com for our articles plus TV and radio
archives)
(Reprinted with permission from Mr. Herman Tiu-Laurel)
Source: The Daily Tribune
URL:
http://www.tribuneonline.org/commentary/20111223com5.html