• 6 AUGUST - *1907 - Gen. Macario Sakay, one of the Filipino military leaders who had continued fighting the imperialist United States invaders eight years into the Ph...
    11 years ago

......................................................................................

The Daily Tribune

(Without Fear or Favor)

Specials:

Bulatlat.com

World Wildlife Fund for Nature-Philippines

The Philippines Matrix Project

Evils of the media oligarchy DIE HARD III Herman Tiu Laurel 06/21/2010

Monday, June 21, 2010

Evils of the media oligarchy



DIE HARD III
Herman Tiu Laurel
06/21/2010

Late last May, mainstream newspapers trumpeted the 7.3 percent GDP growth rate the outgoing Arroyo regime touted as the highest since 2007. Just two weeks later on June 15, the same newspapers reported that unemployment rose to 8 percent from 7.3 percent in January and 7.5 percent in the same period last year. Economist Alejandro “Ding” Lichauco noted the contradiction: “What kind of growth is this that actually loses jobs instead of creating them?” His explanation that “the growth was all election spending” sparked a remark from me: “Those billions of campaign funds went into buying ‘baller IDs,’ hand fans, caps, sticker body tattoos, tons of plastic campaign posters, and tons of cheap printed t-shirts from China!” But that’s not all of it.

Worst of all had been the candidates’ expenditure in broadcast media. From the highest to the lowest posts, candidates’ media spending could have run up to P30 billion. Nielsen’s Market Research estimates that 75 percent of such media spending went to TV; 5 percent to radio; and the rest divided among print and other media. Nobody really knows the absolute total since even the top candidates, such as the president-to-be, are presumed by seasoned election watchers to have grossly understated their official report of expenses to the Comelec. The Nielsen’s Market Research and the NGO consortium, Pera at Pulitika, monitoring the campaign expenses have their reports but few believe they have captured the real figures. Reports like that of BSA III’s spending of only P403 million is incredible to most analysts.

Each of the top four presidential candidates spent up to the billions; the rest of the thousands of candidates in the congressional, provincial and municipal levels put together spent tens of billions more. But these payments for media airtime, especially TV, do not generate new employment. They merely concentrate the flow of money to the two main broadcast networks and eventually cause major dollar drains as these networks have visibly spent much of their billions from campaign advertising earnings by importing top-of-the-line broadcast equipment to match the fancy floor-to-ceiling computer effects screens of CNN which cost fortunes. Broadcast media in the Philippines, which concentrate on entertainment, political or otherwise, do not expand real production in the economy.

In the 1990s, the country had a “political advertising ban” which limited candidates’ media election spending, with Comelec buying media allotments to give “equal time and equal space” to candidates. I benefitted from that in my 1995 Senate run. Posters were limited to “common areas,” a rule retained today but observed in the breach. Those rules responded to popular disgust with election overspending in the 1980s that always left the country poorer and dirtier. Then, Sen. Raul Roco in 2001 pushed RA 9006, the so-called Fair Elections Act, which lifted the political ad ban and has since made our national election campaigns more and more expensive — like the good old bad days when election costs had become unfair to candidates with little funds. It is clear that the media oligarchs were behind RA 9006, mobilizing politicians and NGOs like Melinda de Jesus’ media watchdog, as well as the KBP to lobby for it.

The only real (and really big) winner in the May 2010 elections is the Philippine broadcast media and, as evidenced by the rising unemployment, it left the country a lot poorer. It seems that we have held the elections only to benefit the media oligarchy. Why, the elections also led to the “triumph” of the candidate which the media oligarchs have supported all along. It seems that the losing presidential candidates were cooked in their own lard, paying through their noses billions in advertising charges that were giving cleverly disguised on-the-house media exposure, news insertions and, as many suspect, pay-later advertising to their top rival. After the elections, one of the broadcast giant’s minions will likely be appointed to a Cabinet seat such as the DPWH or DoTC.

Mainstream print media are villainous too as highlighted by one recent case: The sacking of Belinda Cunanan by the Philippine Daily Inquirer (PDI). The PDI masthead which claims that it stands for “Balanced News, Fearless Views” has constantly been belied by its putting the pro-Gloria, anti-Erap, then anti-Noynoy columnist prominently on top of its op-ed section’s second page throughout Gloria Arroyo’s nine-and-a-half year reign. It was only after the election triumph of BSA III whom PDI had clearly supported that Cunanan was summarily fired. Despite the claim of PDI that it has accepted Cunanan’s resignation, the latter denies that she ever did.

To begin with, the PDI never had balance in its news or views on Erap as it’s only known for coddling either pro-Gloria or pro-Yellow columnists. But now that Gloria is out and Noynoy is in, it seems that the newspaper won’t even allow one anti-Noynoy columnist to exist alongside its horde of Yellow writers!

But frankly, all these evils we see today in Philippine media pale in comparison to what happened in 2001 when they actively aided and abetted the ouster of the popularly-elected President Estrada by demonizing him, fanning the frenzy of the Cardinal Sin-Yellow Army mob, and rationalizing the treason of AFP and PNP generals. Not stopping at that, they later kept vital information about the Epira law which allowed the highest power rates in Asia to slip through public scrutiny. Then they lobbied for the removal of the “political advertising ban” and swept the Garci cheating under the rug for a whole year. Today, they are trying to sweep “Hocus PCOS” under the rug as well by helping Smartmatic’s “Miss Transparency” distract the nation’s attention.

(Tune in to 1098AM, Sulo ng Pilipino, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, 6 p.m. to 7 p.m.; Destiny Cable Channel 21, Talk News TV — Infowars Edition, Tuesday, 7 p.m. to 8 p.m.; also visit http://hermantiulaurel.blogspot.com)



(Reprinted with permission by Mr. Herman Tiu-Laurel)

SourceThe Daily Tribune

URL: http://www.tribuneonline.org/commentary/20100621com5.html

0 comments

Blog Archive