Comelec: Same PCOS for 2013 polls
| By Marie A. Surbano 06/11/2010 Still  insisting that the automated elections were a huge success due to the  speed with which the election results were posted, a few hours after the  polls closed, and dismissing all charges of electronic fraud as  baseless, coming as they do from losing candidates, Commission on  Elections Commissioner Gregorio Larrazabal yesterday said that the PCOS  and its system will still be utilized for the 2013 polls. Larrazabal said he and the rest of the poll officials  realized the use of PCOS machines as vital in the next elections because  it has been proven to be fast. But he stressed  “we have to discuss this in the en banc. (But off-hand), we have come to  agree that the (PCOS) system is ideal for 2013…  Personally, I think it should be the PCOS because people now know how to  vote.” In its probe, the House committee on  suffrage and electoral reforms uncovered instances far too numerous to  be ignored, of pre-shaded ballots, discrepancies in dates, time and  results in election returns (ERs), re-scanned ballots and unconfirmed  reports of pre-programmed compact flash (CF) cards, and a possible  connivance between Smartmatic, the technical provider and Comelec to  leave the doors wide open for electronic fraud. The  Comelec leased over 82,200 PCOS machines to the consortium of  Smartmatic Corp-Total Information Management Corp., for P7.2 billion. Five days before the May 10 polls, however, the Comelec  ordered the recall of all its compact flash cards after showing  technical problems when machines rejected reading the names of the  candidates for the local positions. Larrazabal   admitted that the system is still in need of more improvements but  pointed that the May 10 elections was definitely “better”. “It’s not a perfect election but definitely it’s a  better election compared to previous elections,” said Larrazabal. “It  heralded a new era of elections in the country. And in 2013, the voters  would expect nothing less than that.” Some of the  proofs of the “better elections”, Larrazabal noted, are  the faster time  to cast the votes, the opportunity to see all the names of the  candidates in the ballots, and the speed of the results’ availability. Source: The Daily Tribune URL: http://www.tribuneonline.org/headlines/20100611hed6.html | 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


0 comments
Post a Comment