| 
 So what is wrong, legally, constitutionally and even morally, in getting the Constitution changed, whether this is a resolution or a bill filed by former President now Pampanga Rep. Gloria Arroyo, or anyone else? Everybody knows that the 1987 Constitution is fatally  flawed, having been twisted too much through the years, and made legal  by a Malacañang-friendly high court, bringing about more and more doors  opened for the abuse of the powers of the presidency. There is a dire need for constitutional change, and this  should be done now, when the Filipino people have just given Congress a  fresh mandate. Yet every single time a new  Malacañang tenant and his allies who are suddenly in power and position,  comes in, there is objection to changing the Charter. Under the Ramos presidency, there was public resistance  to having Charter change (Cha-cha) through the people’s initiative (PI)  since it became much too clear that Ramos was pushing the lifting of  term limits, which would then translate to his being able to seek  re-election, as well as for his allies in Congress. The overall objection then to Cha-cha was that it was  not the right time to effect changes; PI, as fashioned, was  unconstitutional; Congress, on its last year, was no longer the right  body to effect changes.  Under the Estrada  presidency, even as he made it clear that only the economic provisions  would be touched for amendments, this again was rejected by the usual  civil society types, injecting the fear factor of his wanting to stay in  power. Source: The Daily Tribune URL: http://www.tribuneonline.org/commentary/20100703com1.html | 
 | 
29. Alam n'yo kaya na ngayon ang ika-115 na pagdiriwang ng pinakaunang 
labanan ng Himagsikan bago pa man ang pangkalahataang pag-aaklas? Ngayon 
unang lum...
14 years ago

 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 


0 comments
Post a Comment