| 
 One shouldn’t begrudge Sen. Mar Roxas and his camp for making an issue over the so-called null votes, said to be both an overvote, a no vote ballot and a machine-unread vote. For that matter no one  should begrudge a losing candidate for any position to make this an  issue along with their claims of electronic fraud. At  the same time, one shouldn’t get all upset over the insistence of Jojo  Binay and his camp to object to the Roxas camp’s broiling over the issue  of null votes. The reason is simple: If the  results showed the reverse and favored Roxas, the Binay camp would have  made an issue of this null vote. But as Roxas appears to be losing the  race, this is expected from the Binay camp. Few,  if any, of the losing candidates would want to go through an electoral  protest, whether in the Comelec, the House, the Senate, or the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET),  which is the Supreme Court (SC). Apart from such  moves that entail millions of pesos just for a review of the vote count,  the fact is that as electoral protests go in this country, such  protests are useless, since it takes forever for the respective bodies  to declare a protestant the winner. More often than not, as evidenced in  the very recent past, it takes some three years for the Comelec to  reverse the victory of a governor, mayor or a lower office. By the time a reversal of decision is rendered by the  Comelec, the “real” winner of the local race would not even be able to  sit, as another election has been scheduled. Source: The Daily Tribune URL: http://www.tribuneonline.org/commentary/20100607com2.html | 
 | 
29. Alam n'yo kaya na ngayon ang ika-115 na pagdiriwang ng pinakaunang 
labanan ng Himagsikan bago pa man ang pangkalahataang pag-aaklas? Ngayon 
unang lum...
14 years ago

 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 


0 comments
Post a Comment