| 
 Talking peace with insurgents hardly brings about any peace or peace agreements. What talking peace does, between insurgents and the government, is merely to provide government and its military — as well as the insurgents — some breathing space. This  peace talks move is always being brought up by every new government, but  ends up with no peace agreement in the horizon, especially when the  government is already on the way out. The reason  for peace talks not getting anywhere is that the demands of the  insurgents cannot be met constitutionally by a government operating  under constitutional rules. Take the case of the  Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) and the Arroyo government’s peace  talks, where much was promised by Gloria upon attaining power. The MILF  demanded a sub-state, in reality, an independent Islamic state within  the Republic of the Philippines, and getting a large slice of the  Republic’s territories, a demand which goes against the constitutional  grain. Gloria was ready to give the MILF all it demanded, even after  having already given the rebels a piece of the territory to control. No agreement was possible, as the high court ruled that  this was unconstitutional. But, except for sporadic firefights between  rebels and government troops, there was some kind of ceasefire during  Gloria’s nine-year stay in Malacañang. Similarly,  there were peace talks between the communists and the Arroyo government,  but these talks too, collapsed, mainly because the demands were pretty  steep. Source: The Daily Tribune URL: http://www.tribuneonline.org/commentary/20100622com2.html | 
 | 
29. Alam n'yo kaya na ngayon ang ika-115 na pagdiriwang ng pinakaunang 
labanan ng Himagsikan bago pa man ang pangkalahataang pag-aaklas? Ngayon 
unang lum...
14 years ago

 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 


0 comments
Post a Comment