All signs point to massive electronic fraud
| 
 Probably the best testimony given before the House committee panel probing allegations of electronic fraud as well as the sins of the poll body and its partner, Smartmatic, was that of Jonathan Manalang of LRA Pacific, a call center whose services were subcontracted by Smartmatic as a support group. Reports said he testified that the  call center received calls from technicians needing help or updates on  the progress of the polls, as well as reports from them on results  transmission.  Manalang was quoted as saying that  it was strange that the Commission on Elections (Comelec), close to  midnight, was already announcing that half of the results were already  in, even when the call center received reports of electronic vote  transmission only at 9 p.m. and that these were only a handful. Twenty  percent of the results, the testimony went, came in by 3 a.m. From where then did the Comelec get its 50 percent  figures of the precinct vote when there were as yet no reports of such  transmissions? Smartmatic, which is hardly  consistent in its answers as it keeps on changing its stories everytime  it is caught lying, claimed that  not all of the technicians reported  the transmission of election results on time and that there were times  when transmissions were done directly from the precint count optical  scan (PCOS) but that these were not reported to the call center. That’s a  pretty lame answer. Even more telling is the fact  that it was admitted by Cesar Flores of Smartmatic that the compact  flash (CF) cards could be used again to scan and read ballots already  scanned, which translates opening the doors to a manipulation of votes. Source: The Daily Tribune URL: http://www.tribuneonline.org/commentary/20100610com1.html | 
 | 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 


0 comments
Post a Comment