Memoirs of Britain’s ‘prince of  darkness’ stir political row
| focus | 
LONDON — A bitter row over the gossipy memoirs of top British politician Peter Mandelson is threatening to overshadow the Labour party’s election of a new leader to replace Gordon Brown.
Mandelson was,  with Brown and Tony Blair, part of  the most powerful troika in British  politics until center-left Labour  was voted out of office and into  opposition in May for the first time  since 1997.
The  flamboyant arch-spinner, nicknamed the “prince  of darkness,” was  Brown’s deputy prime minister and a controversial  minister who quit  twice under Blair, giving him an unrivalled insight  into the turbulent  New Labour he helped build.
Now the  56-year-old is  telling all about his years as the power behind the  throne in a memoir  entitled “The Third Man,” out Thursday, which has  drawn a furious  reaction from some Labour colleagues.
Early  extracts  published by The Times detail  how Brown’s  hopes of clinging to power in May by forming a coalition  with the  centrist Liberal Democrats were scuppered by LibDem leader  Nick Clegg,  who said he could not work with him.
Clegg now  holds Mandelson’s old job, serving as  deputy to Conservative Prime  Minister David Cameron in a coalition  government which is imposing  punishing spending cuts in a bid to reduce  a record deficit accrued  under Labour.
It is the timing of Mandelson’s book  which has  caused anger — the memoirs have thrown the spotlight on  Labour’s  feud-ridden past, in the middle of a four-month-long leadership   election.
Charlie Whelan, Brown’s former spin  doctor and one  of his closest allies, accused Mandelson, who ran the  party’s failed  re-election bid, of having concentrated on his book, not  the election,  in the run-up to May’s crunch poll.
“Peter  ran the worst  general campaign in Labour’s history. Nobody knew what  the message was  at all. It was a disaster from beginning to end,” he  told the Sunday  Telegraph.... MORESource: The Daily Tribune
URL: http://www.tribuneonline.org/commentary/20100714com5.html

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

0 comments
Post a Comment