| 
 It will hardly be admitted by the Commission on Elections (Comelec), its partner, Smartmatic-TIM, and of course the winning candidates that the automated presidential election was an utter failure. Sure, the automation gave out the election results just  hours after the polls closed, but were the results correct and accurate  and were they credible? More importantly, were the  votes rigged, to favor certain candidates?  There  is certainly a lot of doubt, given the many mysterious ways the poll  body and Smartmatic went into, to ensure that a lot of human  intervention came into play — which human intervention was supposed to  have been eliminated by the Automated Election System (AES). Truth is, the Comelec insisted on going into the AES,  knowing that it was ill-prepared for automation, refusing to strictly  adhere to the automation law which called for some sort of a pilot  automated election, with just a few cities, provinces and municipalities  in the three regions of the country participating, having been blinded  by the huge P11.3 billion budget of the Comelec for the 2010 polls. Truth too, is that the Comelec bungled the AES, big  time, along with its partner, Smartmatic, that was probably only to  eager to do away with a lot of provisions of the automation law and the  contract demands. After all, even as Smartmatic  and Comelec failed the SysTest Lab’s 99.995 accuracy test, mainly  because the conditions demanded by SysTest for such accuracy and  integrity of the program and system were never met, they still claimed  that such a certification was issued, which was a complete lie, since  conditions imposed by SysTest were never complied with. Source: The Daily Tribune URL: http://www.tribuneonline.org/commentary/20100608com2.html | 
 | 
29. Alam n'yo kaya na ngayon ang ika-115 na pagdiriwang ng pinakaunang 
labanan ng Himagsikan bago pa man ang pangkalahataang pag-aaklas? Ngayon 
unang lum...
14 years ago

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

0 comments
Post a Comment