How to authenticate CoCs if ER is unsigned digitally
| By Orlando Roncesvalles 
 The central question for Congress as a canvassing body is this: How do we know that the Certificates of Canvass (CoCs) are duly executed, if the electronic Election Returns (ERs) on which they are based are not duly executed? Here’s a method for ensuring a proper  CoC in the public canvass at Congress, under conditions where the  precinct-level ERs were not digitally signed. I  presume that the printed ER is nonetheless manually signed by the Board  of Election Inspectors (BEI). At the very least there is a precinct  count optical scan (PCOS)-printed ER distributed to candidates at the  end of the election day. CoCs at the first level,  say at the municipal level, are printed out by computer from electronic transmissions (by  modem or by reading of CF cards). The proper person signing on the CoC  cannot properly attest that the CoC is duly executed if there is a  discrepancy between the printed ER and the electronically transmitted  (but digitally unsigned) ER.  How does that  signatory know that there is no discrepancy? Ordinarily, he knows or he  can safely presume there is no discrepancy because there was a digital  signature on the ER indicating reliability of the electronically  transmitted ER. Extraordinarily, he could publicly and manually compare  the printed ER and the electronic ER. If he did this, then the CoC is  authentic on its face. (There may still be problems if the PCOS was  “pre-loaded” or “post-loaded” with irregular ballots prior to printing  the ER and its electronic transmission, and such problems may not even  be discovered by a manual audit, but this is a different story.) Source: The Daily Tribune URL: http://www.tribuneonline.org/commentary/20100530com6.html | 
 | 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

0 comments
Post a Comment